Instantly download PRINCE2-7-Practitioner updated real questions

During a periodic evaluation of the security-system work package, the team manager reviews the work package description, team plan, and the related issue, risk, quality, product, and lessons information. Missing electrical cabling means that installation is now forecast to finish one week late, exceeding the work-package time tolerance.
The team manager raises the issue with the project manager and reports the current status in the checkpoint report. Is this an appropriate application of the 'evaluate a work package' activity, and why?

• A. Yes, because the team manager should review the work-package information, report progress for the agreed period, and notify the project manager when a tolerance is forecast to be exceeded
• B. No, because only the project manager may evaluate the status of a work package and decide what it should report
• C. No, because a forecast work-package tolerance breach should be reported directly to the project board in an exception report
• D. Yes, because evaluation confirms that completed quality activities are recorded and that the current status is understood by the relevant parties

BuildyBrick is demobilizing after delivering the shopping centre on time and within budget. Before the remaining supplier personnel leave, the project manager checks that the Council's operations and facilities teams are ready to receive, operate and maintain the completed centre.
Why is this an appropriate application of the 'confirm project acceptance' activity?

• A. Because all project information should be archived before the completed project product is accepted
• B. Because the project manager should complete the end project performance assessment before any supplier demobilizes
• C. Because the project manager should arrange a celebration before the contractor leaves the site
• D. Because the project manager should confirm that handover to the operational and maintenance environment is complete

BuildyBrick's planning specialist suggests that the project manager should prepare stage plans only for stages
2 and 4, while BuildyBrick should prepare the stage plans for stages 3 and 5 because suppliers will deliver most of the work.
Is this an appropriate application of the plans practice, and why?

• A. No, because each external supplier should prepare the complete stage plan for the stage in which it works
• B. No, because the project manager remains responsible for preparing each stage plan; team managers may prepare team plans and detailed work package information
• C. Yes, because the project manager should prepare stage plans only for stages involving more than one supplier
• D. Yes, because the specialist supplier should own the stage plan whenever it delivers most of the stage products, and team managers can prepare the relevant information

QUALITY
Here are three items of information relating to the testing of the solar panels during stage 4.
Under which heading of the quality register (A-E) should each item be recorded?
Choose only ONE heading for each item. Each heading can be used once, more than once, or not at all.

• A. Responsibilities
• B. Records
  Item 1:
  Specialist equipment will be used to verify that the energy output from the solar panels meets the applicable industry standards.
  Item 2:
  The solar-panel testing will be completed in week 2 of stage 4, one week after the security-system testing.
  Item 3:
  Testing found that one solar panel did not meet the required energy-output standard.
• C. Dates
• D. Result
• E. Quality method

RISK
Here are three items of information relating to the 'risk' practice.
In which management product (A-E) should each item be recorded?
Choose only ONE management product for each item of information. Each management product may be used once, more than once, or not at all.

• A. Issue register
• B. Issue report
• C. Risk register
• D. Risk management approach
  Item 1:
  A cracked pane has already been identified and replacement is planned for next week. The project manager records the separate uncertainty that the supplier may miss that future replacement date and delay subsequent work.
  Item 2:
  The agreed procedure states that the project board and project manager will review all open risks during every end stage assessment.
  Item 3:
  The project will use a red-amber-green scale to classify risks according to their overall severity.
• E. Quality management approach